[ironic][molteniron][qa] Anyone still using MoltenIron?

Julia Kreger juliaashleykreger at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 18:27:00 UTC 2021


I could have sworn that zuul had support to be basic
selection/checkout of a resource instead of calling out to something
else.

Oh well! Good to know. Thanks Eric!

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:23 AM Barrera, Eric <Eric.Barrera at dell.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Julia,
>
> Yea, the Zuul based Third Party CI I'm building uses Molten Iron to manage bare metal. I believe other Ironic 3rd Party CI projects are also using it.
>
> Though, I don't see it as an absolute necessity.
>
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
>
>
> Internal Use - Confidential
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 11:25 AM
> To: openstack-discuss
> Subject: [ironic][molteniron][qa] Anyone still using MoltenIron?
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Out of curiosity, is anyone still using MotltenIron?
>
> A little historical context: It was originally tooling that came out of IBM to reserve physical nodes in a CI cluster in order to perform testing. It was never intended to be released as it was tooling
> *purely* for CI job usage.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that the ironic team is considering going ahead and retiring the repository.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Julia



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list