Open Stack

Hi Slawek,

Yes, after adding extension, SG created with stateful=false.

# neutron ext-list | grep stateful-security-group
neutron CLI is deprecated and will be removed in the Z cycle. Use openstack
CLI instead.
| stateful-security-group                 | Stateful security group

# openstack security group  create --stateless sec02-stateless
+-----------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Field           | Value

                                           |
+-----------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| created_at      | 2021-11-02T09:02:42Z

                                            |
| description     | sec02-stateless

                                           |
| id              | 29c28678-9a03-496c-8157-4afbcdc8f2af

                                            |
| name            | sec02-stateless

                                           |
| project_id      | 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f

                                            |
| revision_number | 1

                                           |
| rules           | created_at='2021-11-02T09:02:42Z', direction='egress',
ethertype='IPv6', id='17079c04-dc1d-4fbd-9f15-e79c6e585932',
standard_attr_id='2863', updated_at='2021-11-02T09:02:42Z' |
|                 | created_at='2021-11-02T09:02:42Z', direction='egress',
ethertype='IPv4', id='fadfbf09-f759-453d-b493-e6f73077113a',
standard_attr_id='2860', updated_at='2021-11-02T09:02:42Z' |
| stateful        | False

                                           |
| tags            | []

                                            |
| updated_at      | 2021-11-02T09:02:42Z

                                            |
+-----------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Let me test this feature further.

Ammad

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:54 PM Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On wtorek, 2 listopada 2021 09:29:13 CET Ammad Syed wrote:
> > Thanks Lajos,
> >
> > I was checking the release notes and found that stateless acl is
> supported
> > by ovn in xena.
> >
> > https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/neutron/
> xena.html#:~:text=Support%20st
> > ateless%20security%20groups%20with%20the%20latest%20OVN%2021.06%2B.
> %20The%20st
> >
>
> ateful%3DFalse%20security%20groups%20are%20mapped%20to%20the%20new%20%E2%80%9C
> > allow-stateless%E2%80%9D%20OVN%20ACL%20verb .
>
> It should be supported by the OVN driver now IIRC. Maybe we forgot about
> adding this extension to the list:
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/
> master/neutron/common/ovn/extensions.py#L93
> <https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/common/ovn/extensions.py#L93>
> Can You try to add it there and see if the extension will be loaded then?
>
> >
> > Ammad
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:25 PM Lajos Katona <katonalala at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > statefull security-groups are only available with iptables based
> drivers:
> > >
> > >
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/572767/53/releasenotes/
> note
> > > s/stateful-security-group-04b2902ed9c44e4f.yaml
> > >
> > > For OVS and OVN we have open RFE, nut as I know at the moment nobody
> works
> > > on them:
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1885261
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1885262
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)
> > >
> > > Ammad Syed <syedammad83 at gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2021. nov. 2.,
> K,
> > >
> > > 9:00):
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I have upgraded my lab to latest xena release and ovn 21.09 and ovs
> 2.16.
> > >> I am trying to create stateless security group. But its getting
> failed
> with
> > >> below error message.
> > >>
> > >> # openstack security group  create --stateless sec02-stateless
> > >> Error while executing command: BadRequestException: 400, Unrecognized
> > >> attribute(s) 'stateful'
> > >>
> > >> I see below logs in neutron server logs.
> > >>
> > >> 2021-11-02 12:47:41.921 1346 DEBUG neutron.wsgi [-] (1346) accepted
> > >> ('172.16.40.45', 41272) server
> > >> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py:992
> > >> 2021-11-02 12:47:42.166 1346 DEBUG neutron.api.v2.base
> > >> [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481
> 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8
> > >> 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] Request body:
> > >> {'security_group': {'name': 'sec02-stateless', 'stateful': False,
> > >> 'description': 'sec02-stateless'}} prepare_request_body
> > >> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/neutron/api/v2/base.py:729
> > >> 2021-11-02 12:47:42.167 1346 WARNING neutron.api.v2.base
> > >> [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481
> 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8
> > >> 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] An exception
> happened
> > >> while processing the request body. The exception message is
> [Unrecognized
> > >> attribute(s) 'stateful'].: webob.exc.HTTPBadRequest: Unrecognized
> > >> attribute(s) 'stateful'
> > >> 2021-11-02 12:47:42.167 1346 INFO neutron.api.v2.resource
> > >> [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481
> 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8
> > >> 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] create failed
> (client
> > >> error): Unrecognized attribute(s) 'stateful'
> > >> 2021-11-02 12:47:42.168 1346 INFO neutron.wsgi
> > >> [req-b6a37fff-090f-4754-9df7-6e4314ed9481
> 19844bf62a7b498eb443508ef150e9b8
> > >> 98687873a146418eaeeb54a01693669f - default default] 172.16.40.45 "POST
> > >> /v2.0/security-groups HTTP/1.1" status: 400  len: 317 time: 0.2455938
> > >>
> > >> Any advice on how to fix it ?
> > >>
> > >> Ammad
>
>
> --
> Slawek Kaplonski
> Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat



-- 
Regards,


Syed Ammad Ali
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20211102/35b4b1ac/attachment.htm>