Open Stack

On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:17, Michael Johnson <johnsomor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, nice. I missed the memo on the URL change.
If stackalytics.com is less well maintained, should it be abandoned?
Or redirect to stackalytics.io?
Mark
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:08 PM Andrii Ostapenko <anost1986 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > https://www.stackalytics.io is updated daily and maintained.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:55 PM Michael Johnson <johnsomor at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just an FYI, stackalytics hasn't updated since January, so it's not
> > > going to be a good, current, source of information.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:00 PM Andrii Ostapenko <anost1986 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jimmy,
> > > >
> > > > Stackalytics [0] currently tracks emails identifying and grouping them
> > > > by author, company, module (with some success).
> > > > To answer your challenge we'll need to add a grouping by thread, but
> > > > still need some criteria to mark thread as possibly unanswered. E.g.
> > > > threads having a single message or only messages from a single author,
> > > > or if the last message in a thread contains a question mark.
> > > >
> > > > With no additional information marking thread as closed explicitly,
> > > > all this will still be a guessing, producing candidates for unanswered
> > > > threads.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for bringing this up!
> > > >
> > > > [0] https://www.stackalytics.io/?metric=emails
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:48 PM Jimmy McArthur <jimmy at openstack.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All -
> > > > >
> > > > > Over the last six months or so, we've had feedback from people that feel their questions die on the ML or that are missing ask.openstack.org.  I don't think we should open up the ask.openstack.org can of worms, by any means.  However, I wanted to find out if there was any software out there we could use to track metrics on which questions go unanswered on the ML.  Everything I've found is very focused on email marketing, which is not what we're after.  Would love to try to get some numbers on individuals that are trying to reach out to the ML, but just aren't getting through to anyone.
> > > > >
> > > > > Assuming we get that, I feel like it would be an easy next step to do a monthly or bi-monthly check to reach out to these potential new contributors.  I realize our community is busy and people are, by and large, volunteering their time to answer these questions.  But as hard as that is, it's also tough to pose new questions to a community you're unfamiliar with and then hear crickets.
> > > > >
> > > > > Open to other ideas/thoughts :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers!
> > > > > Jimmy
> > > >
>