[nova] MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION and NEXT_MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION bumps in Wallaby

Kashyap Chamarthy kchamart at redhat.com
Fri Jan 15 10:40:13 UTC 2021


On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:37:23AM +0000, Lee Yarwood wrote:
> 
> Hello all,

Hey,

> We are once again looking to increase the minimum and next minimum
> versions of libvirt and QEMU in the libvirt virt driver.
> 
> These were previously increased late in the Victoria cycle:
> 
> MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION = (5, 0, 0)
> MIN_QEMU_VERSION = (4, 0, 0)
> 
> NEXT_MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION = (6, 0, 0)
> NEXT_MIN_QEMU_VERSION = (4, 2, 0)
> 
> libvirt: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION and NEXT_MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/746981
> 
> I am now proposing the following updates to these versions in Wallaby:
> 
> MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION = (6, 0, 0)
> MIN_QEMU_VERSION = (4, 2, 0)
> 
> NEXT_MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION = (7, 0, 0)
> NEXT_MIN_QEMU_VERSION = (5, 2, 0)
> 
> libvirt: Bump MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION and NEXT_MIN_{LIBVIRT,QEMU}_VERSION
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/754700
> 
> libvirt v6.0.0 and QEMU 4.2.0 being supported by the three LTS releases
> supported by the Wallaby release of OpenStack [1][2].
> 
> libvirt v7.0.0 and QEMU 5.2.0 being slightly aspirational for the next
> minimum versions at this point but given current releases for both
> projects they seem appropriate for the time being.

Yeah, v7.0.0. is fine — it's only one year further (released: Jan 2021)
from v6.0.0 (released: Jan 2020).

> Please let me know ideally in the review if there are any issues with
> this increase.

Looks fine to me.

Thanks!

> Regards,
> 
> [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/wallaby.html
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix
> -- 
> Lee Yarwood                 A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64  6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76



-- 
/kashyap




More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list