[oslo][TC] Dropping lower-constraints testing
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Mon Jan 11 22:02:07 UTC 2021
---- On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:57:37 -0600 Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com> wrote ----
> Le lun. 11 janv. 2021 à 18:11, Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> a écrit :
> On 1/6/21 2:58 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 12/18/20 3:54 PM, hberaud wrote:
> >> In a first time I tried to fix our gates by fixing our lower-constraints
> >> project by project but with around ~36 projects to maintain this is a
> >> painful task, especially due to nested oslo layers inside oslo
> >> himself... I saw the face of the hell of dependencies.
> > Welcome to my world!
> >> Thoughts?
> > Couldn't someone address the dependency loops in Oslo? It's IMO anyway
> > needed.
> AFAIK nobody is volunteering on our side, feel free to send patches to fix them....
> Which libraries have circular dependencies? It's something we've
> intentionally avoided, so if they exist I would consider it a bug.
> Concerning myself, I meant that by example to fix oslo.messaging its LC you should first address those of oslo.log and etc...
> This isn't a circular dependency but an order to follow in our patches to fix all our L.C.
> Also I didn't notice "real" circular dependencies, in other words I only noticed an order to apply to fix all the L.C, but over 36 projects that order is a bit annoying, that's all.
I have added this topic to the next TC meeting on the 14th Jan agenda to get consensus for all the projects.
> > Just my 2 cents, not sure if that helps...
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> Hervé BeraudSenior Software Engineer at Red Hatirc: hberaudhttps://github.com/4383/https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the openstack-discuss