Open Stack

Hello,

You need an active subscription RHOSP for doing that , but Kolla was not supported by Redhat unfortunely ...

Stéphane Chalansonnet


-----Message d'origine-----
De : openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org> 
Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 22:04
À : openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
Objet : openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56

Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to
	openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	openstack-discuss-owner at lists.openstack.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of
      openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed
      (Jeremy Stanley)
   2. Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for
      Zun containers? (Jason Anderson)
   3. [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge
      discussions at the PTG (Ildiko Vancsa)
   4. Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the
      edge discussions at the PTG (John Fulton)
   5. [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:50:37 +0000
From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org>
To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of
	openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed
Message-ID: <20210408165036.6tkcfwwix5ms3ig4 at yuggoth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On 2021-04-08 11:54:16 +0200 (+0200), Herve Beraud wrote:
[...]
> I proposed a patch to move to nodejs10 all our projects that depend on
> nodejs:
> 
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/785353
> 
> When this patch will be merged I think that this job could be reenqueued.

I reenqueued the tag, but release-openstack-javascript failed on a different problem. NPM complains that there's already a eslint-config-openstack 4.0.1 published which can't be overwritten, but the tag is for 4.1.0... someone should probably update the version parameter in eslint-config-openstack's package.json file, which means it'll need another release tagged anyway (4.1.1?).
--
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210408/961aecf4/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:00:19 +0000
From: Jason Anderson <jasonanderson at uchicago.edu>
To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for
	Zun containers?
Message-ID: <0A70CB1A-35AA-4782-8BF3-496080E47341 at uchicago.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

As usual, “rubber ducking” the openstack-discuss list yielded fruit. It turns out that I didn’t have the l2population mechanism driver enabled. I thought this was optional for some reason. It looks like enabling this and restarting the neutorn-openvswitch-agent has fixed connectivity!

/Jason

> On Apr 8, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Jason Anderson <jasonanderson at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hello stackers,
> 
> I’m interested in using zun to launch containers and assign floating IPs via neutron to those containers. I am deploying zun, kuryr-libnetwork, and neutron with kolla-ansible on the Train release. I’ve configured neutron with one physical network and I’d like to use a VXLAN overlay for tenant networks.
> 
> What works:
> - I can launch containers on a neutron tenant network, they start successfully, they get an IP and can reach each other if they’re co-located on a single host.
> - I can create all my neutron networks, routers, subnets, without (obvious) errors.
> - I can update security groups on the container and see the iptables rules updated appropriately.
> - I can directly create Docker networks using the kuryr driver/type.
> 
> What doesn’t work:
> - I can’t see any vxlan ports on the br-tun OVS bridge
> - I can’t access the exposed container ports from the control/network 
> node via the router netns
> - Because of that, I can’t assign floating IPs because NAT effectively 
> won’t work to reach the containers
> 
> The fact that there are no ports on br-tun is supicious, but I’m not sure how this is supposed to work. I don’t see anything weird in neutron-openvswitch-agent logs but those logs are quite noisy and I’m not sure what to look for.
> 
> Has anybody deployed such a setup / are there limitations I should know about?
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> 
> Jason Anderson
> 
> DevOps Lead, Chameleon
> 
> ---
> 
> Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago Mathematics and 
> Computer Science, Argonne National Laboratory 
> jasonanderson at uchicago.edu
> 


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:18:54 +0200
From: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge
	discussions at the PTG
Message-ID: <0A7B1EBD-0715-43ED-B388-A2011D437DD0 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8

Hi,

I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.

We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project contributors.

We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most people who are interested in participating can join. Our available options are:

* Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC
* Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC

__Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__

Thanks and Best Regards,
Ildikó
(IRC ildikov on Freenode)





------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:39:45 -0400
From: John Fulton <johfulto at redhat.com>
To: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
Cc: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the
	edge discussions at the PTG
Message-ID:
	<CAE66OMCQWZFB+7SM1amzRr1Vq3pOm=fEgtQTuHLh0=0PPXy-sQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:21 PM Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group 
> sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.
>
> We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as 
> one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It 
> would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier 
> discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project contributors.
>
> We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still 
> have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most 
> people who are interested in participating can join. Our available 
> options
> are:
>
> * Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC
> * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC
>

I'm not available Monday but could join Tuesday. I'd be curious to hear what others are doing with Storage on the Edge and could share some info on how TripleO does it.

  John


>
> __Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate 
> and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Ildikó
> (IRC ildikov on Freenode)
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210408/ac34d099/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:04:04 +0000
From: Tony Liu <tonyliu0592 at hotmail.com>
To: "openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org"
	<openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [kolla] RHEL based container image
Message-ID:
	<MWHPR08MB2382486467C9EE24247052B9BD749 at MWHPR08MB2382.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

Given [1], RHEL based container is supported on RHEL 8 by Kolla.
Where can I get RHEL based container images? I see CentOS and Ubuntu based images on docker hub, but can't find RHEL based images.

[1] https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/ussuri/user/support-matrix.html


Thanks!
Tony




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
openstack-discuss mailing list
openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss


------------------------------

End of openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56
*************************************************