[placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar] Placement governance switch(back)

Balázs Gibizer balazs.gibizer at est.tech
Mon Sep 28 11:04:48 UTC 2020



On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:12, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com> 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 17:23:36 CEST Stephen Finucane wrote:
> 
>>  Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would
>>  appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at 
>> transitioning
>>  Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova
>>  governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova 
>> and
>>  other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a
>>  point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting a
>>  release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd the
>>  cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by more
>>  that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate 
>> placement
>>  core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision.
>> 
>>  So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL 
>> for
>>  Victoria, what do we want to do?
> 
> I mentioned this on IRC, but just for completeness, there is another 
> option:
> have the Nova candidate PTL (I assume there is just one) also apply 
> for
> Placement PTL, and handle the 2 realms in a personal union.

As far as I know I'm the only nova PTL candidate so basically you 
asking me to take the Placement PTL role as well. This is a valid 
option. Still, first, I would like to give a chance to the DPL concept 
in Placement in a way yoctozepto suggested.

Cheers,
gibi

> 
> Ciao
> --
> Luigi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list