[tc][all] Wallaby Cycle Community Goals

Kendall Nelson kennelson11 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 18:25:07 UTC 2020


Hey Artem!

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:56 AM Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> On 24. Sep 2020, at 22:39, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
>
>
>  - Finish moving legacy python-*client CLIs to python-openstackclient
>
>
> Go go go !!! :)
>
>
> Cool, that somebody needs that. What we actually miss here is the people
> doing that. Amount of work is really big (while in the long run it will
> definitely help reducing overall efforts). My suggestion is to focus for
> this cycle only on nova (targeting more is simply useless). I have started
> switching some parts in OSC to use SDK (
> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:osc-first). Any help (even simply
> reviews) is welcome. I don’t like summer dev cycle, since the work is
> really close to 0 due to vacations season. But in autumn/winter I will try
> do more if there is acceptance.
>
>
I'm resolving now to be better at reviews over the upcoming months! I have
been hovering around on the peripherie and I think this release I will be
able to get more involved. I plan on attending your PTG sessions and am
trying to rally more help for you as well.


> Honestly speaking I do not believe in a community goal for that any more.
> It was tried, but it feels there is a split in the community. My personal
> opinion is that we should simply start doing that from SDK/CLI side closely
> working with one service at a time (since nova team expressed desire I
> started supporting them. Hope it will bring its fruits). Teams willing that
> will be able to achieve the target, teams not willing are free to stay. TC
> might think differently and act correspondingly, this is just my personal
> opinion. Other approaches seem a bit of utopia to me.
>
>
>
> What about an "openstack purge <project-name>" that would call all
> projects? We once had a "/purge" goal, I'm not sure how far it went...
> What I know, is that purging all resources of a project is currently
> still a big painpoint.
>
>
> Please have a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/734485/ It
> implements an “alternative” from the OSC point of view by invoking
> relatively newly introduced project cleanup functionality in SDK. This
> supports more that original purge (except identity parts), tries to do in
> parallel as much as possible and even now supports filtering (i.e. drop all
> resources created or updated before DD.MM.YYYY). I am not sure here whether
> it should replace purge or come as alternative so far. Here as well -
> reviews and comments are welcome.
>
> For reference, back in Denver it was agreed to go this way, since no other
> approach seemed to be really achievable.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Artem
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200925/e5c82970/attachment.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list