[Neutron][FFE][requirements] request for QoS policy update for bound ports feature

Lajos Katona katonalala at gmail.com
Thu Sep 17 06:49:30 UTC 2020


Hi,
The neutron-lib patch is necessary for the use case when the new QoS
min_kbps value for the port is 0.
So would be good to have that on Victoria as well.

Regards
Lajos

Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. szept. 16.,
Sze, 22:21):

> Hi,
>
> For me personally it seems ok to merge approve this FFE as this change
> isn't
> very big and is limited only to the QoS service plugin. So IMHO risk of
> merging
> that isn't very big.
> There is also scenario test proposed for that feature in [1] so we can
> ensure
> that it is working fine.
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:39:27PM +0200, Lajos Katona wrote:
> > Hi
> > The neutron-lib patch (https://review.opendev.org/750349 ) is a bug fix
> > (see [1]) which as do not touch db or API can be backported later in the
> > worst case.
>
> Is ther neutron-lib patch necessary to make all of that working so that
> without
> backporting this fix and releasing new version feature in neutron will not
> work
> at all?
>
> > The fix itself doesn't affect other Neutron features, so no harm.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> > Regards
> > Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)
> >
> > [1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894825
> >
> > Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. szept.
> 15.,
> > K, 18:05):
> >
> > > > I would like to ask for FFE for the RFE "allow replacing the QoS
> > > > policy of bound port", [1].
> > > > This feature adds the extra step to port update operation to change
> > > > the allocation in Placement to the min_kbps values of the new QoS
> > > > policy, if the port has a QoS policy with minimum_bandwidth rule and
> > > > is bound and used by a server.
> > > >
> > > > In neutron there's one open patch:
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/747774
> > > >
> > > > There's an open bug report for the neutron-lib side:
> > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1894825 (placement story:
> > > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008111 )  and a fix for
> that:
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/750349
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1882804
> > > >
> > > Since this requires an update to neutron-lib, adding [requirements] to
> > > the subject. Non-client library freeze was two weeks ago now, so it's a
> > > bit late.
> > >
> > > The fix looks fairly minor, but I don't know that code. Can you comment
> > > on the potential risks of this change? We should be stabilizing as much
> > > as possible at this point as we approach the final victoria release
> date.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743695
>
> --
> Slawek Kaplonski
> Senior software engineer
> Red Hat
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200917/de1007ce/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list