There's always something I miss... sorry. The subject line should say Karbor, nor Qinling. Starting a new thread. Please disregard this one. -Kendall (diablo_rojo) On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:18 PM Kendall Nelson <kennelson11 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > As you know, Karbor is a leaderless project for the Wallaby cycle, which means there is no PTL > candidate to lead it in the Wallaby cycle. 'No PTL' and no liaisons for DPL model is one of the criteria > which triggers TC to start checking the health, maintainers of the project for dropping the project > from OpenStack Governance[1]. > > TC discussed the leaderless project in PTG[2] and checked if the project has maintainers and what > activities are done in the Victoria development cycle. It seems no functional changes in Karbor repos > except few gate fixes or community goal commits[3]. > > Based on all these checks and no maintainer for Karbor, TC decided to drop this project from OpenStack > governance in the Wallaby cycle. Ref: Mandatory Repository Retirement resolution [4] and the detailed process > is in the project guide docs [5]. > > If your organization product/customer use/rely on this project then this is the right time to step forward to > maintain it otherwise from the Wallaby cycle, Karbor will move out of OpenStack governance by keeping > their repo under OpenStack namespace with an empty master branch with 'Not Maintained' message in README. > If someone from old or new maintainers shows interest to continue its development then it can be re-added > to OpenStack governance. > > With that thanks to Karbor contributors and PTLs (especially Pengju Jiao) for maintaining this project. > > -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo) > > [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/dropping-projects.html > [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-wallaby-ptg > [3] https://www.stackalytics.com/?release=victoria&module=karbor-group&metric=commits <https://www.stackalytics.com/?release=victoria&module=qinling-group&metric=commits> > [4] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20190711-mandatory-repository-retirement.html > [5] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/repository.html#retiring-a-repository > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201110/13a8d7c5/attachment.html>