Open Stack

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:09, Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> 
wrote:
>  ---- On Mon, 25 May 2020 04:31:41 -0500 Sylvain Bauza 
> <sbauza at redhat.com> wrote ----
>  >
>  >
>  > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:56 PM Balázs Gibizer 
> <balazs.gibizer at est.tech> wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > [This is a topic from the PTG etherpad [0]. As the PTG time is
>  > intentionally kept short, let's try to discuss it or even conclude 
> it
>  > before the PTG]
>  >
>  > Last cycle we introduced the Feature Liaison process [1]. I think 
> this
>  > is time to reflect on it.
>  > Did it helped?
>  > Do we need to tweak it?
>  >
>  > Personally for me it did not help much but I think this is a 
> fairly low
>  > cost process so I'm OK to keep it as is.
>  >
>  >
>  > Cool with me. Maybe we could just tell it's optional, so we could 
> better see who would like to get some mentor for them.
> 
> +1 on optional and keep it for new contributors which can be any time 
> in the future. So at least if anyone asks we can tell this is
> how you can get some dedicated Core for your code review/help.

I see that those who responded so far are pretty aligned about the 
future of the Feature Liaison, so I proposed an update for the Victoria 
spec template [1] to make this optional. Feel free to continue the 
discussion here or directly in the review.

Cheers,
gibi

[1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/730638

> 
> -gmann
> 
>  > -Sylvain
>  > Cheers,
>  > gibi
>  >
>  >
>  > [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-victoria-ptg
>  > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685857/
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >