[nova] feasibility to keep the two-company rule
balazs.gibizer at est.tech
Tue Mar 24 09:49:35 UTC 2020
Top posting to summarize public and private discussions.
As far as I see overall we agree that the "rule" needs to be less
strict. But as far as I understand we have no consensus in the core
team to drop the rule entirely. We still would like to keep some of
level of control over heavy changes. Where heavy means anything that
involves a microversion, service version, rpc version, or database
migration. I imagine that these changes need an spec anyhow so the
existence of a spec could be a shorthand for when the rule still
In the other hand this means that the implementation of specless
features, bugfixes, doc enhancements, test enhancements, and refactors
can be developed and approved by a single company (but still require
two core reviewers).
Personally I'm OK with this compromise along with the ongoing effort to
add new people to the core team.
As this is an unwritten rule I'm not proposing any doc changes to nova
to describe this. This mail serves as the official proposal and if
there is no major concerns raised against it then this will goes into
effect next Tuesday (03.31.)
(having an unwritten rule feels so backward to me)
More information about the openstack-discuss