Open Stack

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 11:53 AM Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 3/4/20 5:40 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> >   ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita <
> rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote ----
> >   > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,
> >   >
> >   > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.
> >   >
> >   > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
> >   > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0].  Currently, the
> >   > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
> >   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members
> >   > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd like to
> >   > replace them by including the cinder-core group.
> >
> > +1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change.
>
> Great, thanks!
>


I agree this is a great idea to have more members of Cinder joining the
devstack-plugin-ceph team. I would like to have atleast a sub team of
manila core reviewers added to this project if it makes sense. The Manila
CephFS drivers (cephfs-native and cephfs-nfs) are currently being tested
with the help of the devstack integration in devstack-plugin-ceph.

We have Tom Barron (tbarron) in the team, i'd like to propose myself
(gouthamr) and Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc)

Please let me know what you think of the idea.


>
> >   >
> >   > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
> >   > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1].  Currently, the
> >   > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
> >   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members
> >   > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the
> >   > individual members with the cinder-core group.  We also propose that
> >   > devstack-core be added as an included group.
> >   >
> >   > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new devstack
> plugin:
> >   >      openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas
> >   > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being
> introduced
> >   > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in Victoria.
> Our
> >   > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core included
> groups
> >   > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.
> >
> > +1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?
>
> I think it makes sense for these to be under QA governance -- QA would
> own the repo with both QA and Cinder having permission to make changes.
>
> >   >
> >   > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs repo be
> moved
> >   > back into the 'openstack' namespace?
> >
> > If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we have any
> other) then
> > it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.
> > Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder governance or
> QA.
>
> Same here, I think QA should "own" the repo, but Cinder will have
> permission to make changes there.
>
> >
> > Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your proposal of
> calloborative maintainance by
> > devstack-core and cinder-core.
> >
> > -gmann
>
> Thanks for the quick response!
>
> >   >
> >   > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.
> >   >
> >   >
> >   > [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
> >   > [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
> >   > [2]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache
> >   >
> >   >
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200306/dec6424b/attachment-0001.html>