Open Stack

Hi Donny. thanks for your inputs.
Appreciate it

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 7:16 AM Donny Davis <donny at fortnebula.com> wrote:

> I use local NVME storage for FortNebula. Its very fast, and for "cloudy"
> things I prefer availability of data to be above the infrastructure layer.
> I used to use Ceph for all things, but in my experience... if performance
> is  a requirement, local storage is pretty hard to beat.
> I am in the process of moving the object store to ceph, and all seems to
> be well in terms of performance using ceph for that use case.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 6:41 AM Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.deluca at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Burak and Ignazio.
>> Appreciate it
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:19 PM Burak Hoban <Burak.Hoban at iag.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> We use Dell EMC VxFlex OS, which in its current version allows for free
>>> use and commercial (in version 3.5 a licence is needed, but its perpetual).
>>> It's similar to Ceph but more geared towards scale and performance etc (it
>>> use to be called ScaleIO).
>>>
>>> Other than that, I know of a couple sites using SAN storage, but a lot
>>> of people just seem to use Ceph.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Burak
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:20:29 +0100
>>> From: Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocassano at gmail.com>
>>> To: Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.deluca at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [CINDER] Distributed storage alternatives
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <
>>> CAB7j8cXLQWh5fx-E9AveUEa6OncDwCL6BOGc-Pm2TX4FKwnUKg at mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Hello Alfredo, I think best opensource solution is ceph.
>>> As far as commercial solutions are concerned we are working with network
>>> appliance (netapp) and emc unity.
>>> Regards
>>> Ignazio
>>>
>>> Il Gio 13 Feb 2020, 13:48 Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.deluca at gmail.com> ha
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>> > Hi all.
>>> > we 'd like to explore storage back end alternatives to CEPH for
>>> > Openstack
>>> >
>>> > I am aware of GlusterFS but what would you recommend for distributed
>>> > storage like Ceph and specifically for block device provisioning?
>>> > Of course must be:
>>> >
>>> >    1. *Reliable*
>>> >    2. *Fast*
>>> >    3. *Capable of good performance over WAN given a good network back
>>> > end*
>>> >
>>> > Both open source and commercial technologies and ideas are welcome.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > *Alfredo*
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> The information transmitted in this message and its attachments (if any)
>>> is intended
>>> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.
>>> The message may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
>>> review,
>>> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action
>>> in reliance
>>> upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended
>>> recipient is
>>> prohibited.
>>>
>>> If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete
>>> this e-mail
>>> and associated material from any computer.
>>>
>>> The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose
>>> or distribute
>>> the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files, with
>>> the permission
>>> of the sender.
>>>
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses.
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Alfredo*
>>
>>
>
> --
> ~/DonnyD
> C: 805 814 6800
> "No mission too difficult. No sacrifice too great. Duty First"
>


-- 
*Alfredo*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200306/da012f6a/attachment.html>