Open Stack

On 3/4/20 5:40 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>   ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote ----
>   > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,
>   >
>   > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.
>   >
>   > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
>   > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0].  Currently, the
>   > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
>   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members
>   > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd like to
>   > replace them by including the cinder-core group.
> 
> +1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change.

Great, thanks!

>   >
>   > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
>   > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1].  Currently, the
>   > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
>   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members
>   > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the
>   > individual members with the cinder-core group.  We also propose that
>   > devstack-core be added as an included group.
>   >
>   > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new devstack plugin:
>   >      openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas
>   > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being introduced
>   > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in Victoria.  Our
>   > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core included groups
>   > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.
> 
> +1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?

I think it makes sense for these to be under QA governance -- QA would 
own the repo with both QA and Cinder having permission to make changes.

>   >
>   > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs repo be moved
>   > back into the 'openstack' namespace?
> 
> If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we have any other) then
> it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.
> Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder governance or QA.

Same here, I think QA should "own" the repo, but Cinder will have 
permission to make changes there.

> 
> Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your proposal of calloborative maintainance by
> devstack-core and cinder-core.
> 
> -gmann

Thanks for the quick response!

>   >
>   > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.
>   >
>   >
>   > [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
>   > [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
>   > [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache
>   >
>   >
>