Open Stack

Hi Rafael,

I think I applied all the reviews successfully but I tried to do an octavia
dynamic poller but I have couples of errors.

Here is the octavia.yaml: https://paste.xinu.at/kDN6SV/
Error is about syntax error near name: https://paste.xinu.at/MHgDBY/

if i remove the - in front of name like this: https://paste.xinu.at/K7s5I8/
The error is different this time: https://paste.xinu.at/zWdC0U/

Is there something I missed or is something wrong  in yaml?


On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:50 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Since the merging window for ussuri was long passed for those commits, is
>> it safe to assume that it will not land in stable/ussuri at all and those
>> will be available for victoria?
>>
>
> I would say so. We are lacking people to review and then merge it.
>
> How safe is to cherry pick those commits and use them in production?
>>
> As long as the person executing the cherry-picks, and maintaining the code
> knows what she/he is doing, you should be safe. The guys that are using
> this implementation (and others that I and my colleagues proposed), have a
> few openstack components that are customized with the
> patches/enhancements/extensions we developed so far; this means, they are
> not using the community version, but something in-between (the community
> releases + the patches we did). Of course, it is only possible, because we
> are the ones creating and maintaining these codes; therefore, we can assure
> quality for production.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:43 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Rafael,
>>
>> Since the merging window for ussuri was long passed for those commits, is
>> it safe to assume that it will not land in stable/ussuri at all and those
>> will be available for victoria?
>>
>> How safe is to cherry pick those commits and use them in production?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:06 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
>> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The dynamic pollster in Ceilometer will be first released in Ussuri.
>>> However, there are some important PRs still waiting for a merge, that might
>>> be important for your use case:
>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/722092/
>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715180/
>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715289/
>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679999/
>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709807/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:18 AM Carlos Goncalves <cgoncalves at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:20 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to meter the loadbalancer into gnocchi for billing purposes in
>>>>> stein/train and ceilometer doesn't support dynamic pollsters.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think I misunderstood your use case, sorry. I read it as if you
>>>> wanted to know "if a loadbalancer was deployed and has status active".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Until I upgrade to Ussuri, is there a way to accomplish this?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure Ceilometer supports it even in Ussuri. I'll defer to the
>>>> Ceilometer project.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:45 PM Carlos Goncalves <
>>>>> cgoncalves at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ionut,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>> I was trying to add in polling.yaml and pipeline from ceilometer the
>>>>>>> following:
>>>>>>>    - network.services.lb.active.connections
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.health_monitor
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.incoming.bytes
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.listener
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.loadbalancer
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.member
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.outgoing.bytes
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.pool
>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.total.connections
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But it doesn't work, I think they are for the old lbs that were
>>>>>>> supported in neutron.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found
>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/admin/telemetry-dynamic-pollster.html
>>>>>>> but this is not available in stein or train.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a way to meter loadbalancers from
>>>>>>> octavia.
>>>>>>> I mostly want for start to just meter if a loadbalancer was deployed
>>>>>>> and has status active.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can get the provisioning and operating status of Octavia load
>>>>>> balancers via the Octavia API. There is also an API endpoint that returns
>>>>>> the full load balancer status tree [1]. Additionally, Octavia has
>>>>>> three API endpoints for statistics [2][3][4].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope this helps with your use case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-the-load-balancer-status-tree-detail#get-the-load-balancer-status-tree
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-load-balancer-statistics-detail#get-load-balancer-statistics
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-listener-statistics-detail#get-listener-statistics
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=show-amphora-statistics-detail#show-amphora-statistics
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>


-- 
Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200703/f7fdae16/attachment-0001.html>