[tripleo] tripleo-operator-ansible start and request for input

Alex Schultz aschultz at redhat.com
Wed Jan 8 22:18:23 UTC 2020


[Hello folks,

I've begun the basic start of the tripleo-operator-ansible collection
work[0].  At the start of this work, I've chosen the undercloud
installation[1] as the first role to use to figure out how we the end
user's to consume these roles.  I wanted to bring up this initial
implementation so that we can discuss how folks will include these
roles.  The initial implementation is a wrapper around the
tripleoclient command as run via openstackclient.  This means that the
'tripleo-undercloud' role provides implementations for 'openstack
undercloud backup', 'openstack undercloud install', and 'openstack
undercloud upgrade'.

In terms of naming conventions, I'm proposing that we would name the
roles "tripleo-<command-base>" with the last part of the command
action being an "action". Examples:

"openstack undercloud *" ->
role: tripleo-undercloud
action: (backup|install|upgrade)

"openstack undercloud minion *" ->
role: tripleo-undercloud-minion
action: (install|upgrade)

"openstack overcloud *" ->
role: tripleo-overcloud
action: (deploy|delete|export)

"openstack overcloud node *" ->
role: tripleo-overcloud-node
action: (import|introspect|provision|unprovision)

In terms of end user interface, I've got two proposals out in terms of
possible implementations.

Tasks from method:
The initial commit propose that we would require the end user to use
an include_role/tasks_from call to perform the desired action.  For
example:

    - hosts: undercloud
      gather_facts: true
      tasks:
        - name: Install undercloud
          collections:
            - tripleo.operator
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-undercloud
            tasks_from: install
          vars:
            tripleo_undercloud_debug: true

Variable switch method:
I've also proposed an alternative implementation[2] that would use
include_role but require the end user to set a specific variable to
change if the role runs 'install', 'backup' or 'upgrade'. With this
patch the playbook would look something like:

    - hosts: undercloud
      gather_facts: true
      tasks:
        - name: Install undercloud
          collections:
            - tripleo.operator
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-undercloud
          vars:
            tripleo_undercloud_action: install
            tripleo_undercloud_debug: true

I would like to solicit feedback on which one of these is the
preferred integration method when calling these roles. I have two
patches up in tripleo-quickstart-extras to show how these calls could
be run. The "Tasks from method" can be viewed here[3]. The "Variable
switch method" can be viewed here[4].  I can see pros and cons for
both methods.

My take would be:

Tasks from method:
Pros:
 - action is a bit more explicit
 - dynamic logic left up to the playbook/consumer.
 - May not have a 'default' action (as main.yml is empty, though it
could be implemented).
 - tasks_from would be a global implementation across all roles rather
than having a changing variable name.

Cons:
 - internal task file names must be known by the consumer (though IMHO
this is no different than the variable name + values in the other
implementation)
 - role/action inclusions is not dynamic in the role (it can be in the playbook)

Variable switch method:
Pros:
 - inclusion of the role by default runs an install
 - action can be dynamically changed from the calling playbook via an
ansible var
 - structure of the task files is internal to the role and the user of
the role need not know the filenames/structure.

Cons:
 - calling playbook is not explicit in that the action can be switched
dynamically (e.g. intentionally or accidentally because it is dynamic)
 - implementer must know to configure a variable called
`tripleo_undercloud_action` to switch between install/backup/upgrade
actions
 - variable names are likely different depending on the role

My personal preference might be to use the "Tasks from method" because
it would lend itself to the same implementation across all roles and
the dynamic logic is left to the playbook rather than internally in
the role. For example, we'd end up with something like:

    - hosts: undercloud
      gather_facts: true
      collections:
        - tripleo.operator
      tasks:
        - name: Install undercloud
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-undercloud
            tasks_from: install
          vars:
            tripleo_undercloud_debug: true
        - name: Upload images
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud-images
            tasks_from: upload
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_images_debug: true
        - name: Import nodes
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud-node
            tasks_from: import
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_node_debug: true
            tripleo_overcloud_node_import_file: instack.json
        - name: Introspect nodes
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud-node
            tasks_from: introspect
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_node_debug: true
            tripleo_overcloud_node_introspect_all_manageable: True
            tripleo_overcloud_node_introspect_provide: True
        - name: Overcloud deploy
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud
            tasks_from: deploy
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_debug: true
            tripleo_overcloud_deploy_environment_files:
              - /home/stack/params.yaml

The same general tasks performed via the "Variable switch method"
would look something like:

    - hosts: undercloud
      gather_facts: true
      collections:
        - tripleo.operator
      tasks:
        - name: Install undercloud
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-undercloud
          vars:
            tripleo_undercloud_action: install
            tripleo_undercloud_debug: true
        - name: Upload images
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud-images
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_images_action: upload
            tripleo_overcloud_images_debug: true
        - name: Import nodes
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud-node
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_node_action: import
            tripleo_overcloud_node_debug: true
            tripleo_overcloud_node_import_file: instack.json
        - name: Introspect nodes
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud-node
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_node_action: introspect
            tripleo_overcloud_node_debug: true
            tripleo_overcloud_node_introspect_all_manageable: True
            tripleo_overcloud_node_introspect_provide: True
        - name: Overcloud deploy
          import_role:
            name: tripleo-overcloud
          vars:
            tripleo_overcloud_action: deploy
            tripleo_overcloud_debug: true
            tripleo_overcloud_deploy_environment_files:
              - /home/stack/params.yaml

Thoughts?

Thanks,
-Alex

[0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-operator-ansible
[1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699311/
[2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701628/
[3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701034/
[4] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701628/




More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list