Open Stack

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:08 AM Cédric Jeanneret <cjeanner at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 8/18/20 9:53 AM, Rabi Mishra wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 1:07 PM Cédric Jeanneret <cjeanner at redhat.com
> > <mailto:cjeanner at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello there!
> >
> >     I'm wondering if we could move the "tripleo-ansible-inventory" script
> >     from the tripleo-validations repo to tripleo-common.
> >
> >
> > TBH, I don't know the history, but it would be better if we remove all
> > scripts from tripleo-common and use it just as a utility library (now
> > that Mistral is gone). Most of the existing scripts probably have an
> > existing command in tripleoclient. We can implement  missing ones
> > including "tripleo-ansible-inventory" in python-tripleoclient.
>
> would probably be better to implement it directly in tripleoclient imho.
> In any cases, it has nothing to do in tripleo-validations...
>

+1 with that, it will probably be better to move everything in
tripleoclient.


>
> I can't connect to launchpad, they are having some auth issue, I can't
> create an RFE there :(.
>
> >
> >
> >     The main motivation here is to make things consistent:
> >     - that script calls content from tripleo-common, nothing from
> >     tripleo-validations.
> >     - that script isn't only for the validations, so it makes more sense
> to
> >     install it via tripleo-common
> >     - in fact, we should probably push that inventory thing as an
> `openstack
> >     tripleo' sub-command, but that's another story
> >
> >     So, is there any opposition to this proposal?
> >
> >     Cheers,
> >
> >     C.
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Cédric Jeanneret (He/Him/His)
> >     Sr. Software Engineer - OpenStack Platform
> >     Deployment Framework TC
> >     Red Hat EMEA
> >     https://www.redhat.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Rabi Mishra
> >
>
> --
> Cédric Jeanneret (He/Him/His)
> Sr. Software Engineer - OpenStack Platform
> Deployment Framework TC
> Red Hat EMEA
> https://www.redhat.com/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200818/b0901faf/attachment-0001.html>