Open Stack

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:30 PM Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com> wrote:

> Looking to see if there are strong preferences for our time slots for the
> PTG.  I would suggest we try to shoot for 13-17 UTC slot [1] as much as
> possible.  Any strong preference in not utilizing that time slot
>

One suggestion. I think we could have 2 kinds of time slots. One that is
APAC / EMEA friendly and another which is NA / EMEA friendly.
If we do well with Etherpad / IRC / emails, we can certainly deal with
missing folks in some sessions and eventually do smaller sessions but more
distributed time-wise.

Example given: "Session about improving Upgrade CLI"
- a first session on EMEA morning / APAC afternoon; notes taken in
etherpad, sent to ML
- a second session on EMEA afternoon / NA morning; notes taken in etherpad,
summary of both sessions sent to ML; if consensus isn't reached; use ML or
schedule a third session out of band eventually.

I would like to see this exercise as an opportunity to learn how we can
make decisions in async; involving everyone interested in a topic, no
matter the location/timezone.

So what I propose is that each session leader makes sure that the sessions
can cover an overlapped time (hard to define though) or think about the
"multiple smaller sessions" idea.

What do you think?
-- 
Emilien Macchi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200416/47ada2a8/attachment.html>