On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 01:14:38PM +0100, Graham Hayes wrote: > Hi All, > > We had two votes running for the TC - V->Z naming, and the TC Chair. > > The results are as follows: > > Release Naming: > > 1. Tied: > Do not change current model of geographic names - No review > Name releases after major cities - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677745/ > 3. > Name releases after the ICAO alphabet - > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677746/ > > Full results: > https://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?num_winners=1&id=E_0a9abdadec887a6b&algorithm=beatpath > The scope of this vote was not clear. This was only as far as changing the naming scheme for the remaining V-X, right? Or was it meant for anything past Ussuri? If it's the former, then I am very happy to see there was not strong support to changing the current naming scheme mid-alphabet. I believe that would have been confusing (or just out right odd) to our end users. I do hope to see a plan for what we would like to see happen once we cycle back to A though. Sean