[kuryr] [tc] kuryr project mission
dmellado at redhat.com
Tue Oct 29 11:49:53 UTC 2019
On 10/29/19 9:52 AM, Michał Dulko wrote:
> It's been more than a year after fuxi  and fuxi-kubernetes  were
> declared as retired. First one was supposed to integrate Docker with
> Cinder and Manila. The second was aiming to do the same with
> I'm not really sure how to serve the first use case, but it seems like
> there are some alternatives , . fuxi-kubernetes use case is now
> served by Cloud Provider OpenStack in Cinder  and Manila  CSI
> plugins, which seem like a much better fit.
> Currently the only maintained deliverables in kuryr project are kuryr,
> kuryr-libnetwork and kuryr-kubernetes. All of them are related to
> networking. Given that I'd like to propose rephrasing Kuryr mission
> statement from:
>> Bridge between container framework networking and storage models
>> to OpenStack networking and storage abstractions.
>> Bridge between container framework networking models
>> to OpenStack networking abstractions.
> effectively getting storage out of project scope.
Do totally agree, both fuxi and fuxi-kubernetes are now completely
deprecated and overridden by another projects, so tbh it doesn't make
sense to keep the 'storage' label around any longer.
> Are there any thoughts or objections? Maybe someone sees a better
Let's just drop the storage part for now
>  https://opendev.org/openstack/fuxi
>  https://opendev.org/openstack/fuxi-kubernetes
>  https://rexray.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user-guide/schedulers/docker/plug-ins/openstack/
>  https://github.com/j-griffith/cinder-docker-driver
>  https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/docs/using-cinder-csi-plugin.md
>  https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/docs/using-manila-csi-plugin.md
More information about the openstack-discuss