Open Stack

On 11/14/2019 1:45 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
> For me from the sharing disk provider feature perspective the placement
> aggregate that is needed for the sharing to work, and any kind of nova
> host aggregate (either synced to placement or not) is independent. The
> placement aggregate is a must for the feature. On top of that if the
> operator wants to create a nova host aggregate as well and sync it to
> placement then at the end there will be two, independent placement
> aggregates. One to express the sharing relationship and one to express
> a host aggregate from nova. These two aggregate will not be the same as
> the first one will have the sharing provider in it while the second one
> doesn't.

I tend to agree with the simplicity of this as well.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt