[nova] stable-maint is especially unhealthily RH-centric

Matt Riedemann mriedemos at gmail.com
Thu May 23 18:12:16 UTC 2019

On 5/23/2019 12:01 PM, Elõd Illés wrote:
> I know that to become a stable core
> for a project needs to be a core of that project already and to know
> stable rules. My question is: wouldn't it be possible to someone who
> proves that he/she knows and follows the stable rules could be a stable
> core without being a core before?

This isn't true. tonyb and lyarwood are not nova core but are stable 
core for nova.




More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list