[fenix][ptg] summary

Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) tomi.juvonen at nokia.com
Sun May 5 01:28:59 UTC 2019

Fenix Train PTG, What to do next, prioritizing

      Two non-Telco users would like to use Fenix to maintain their cloud. For this, Fenix need to prioritize work so we can provide production ready framework without Telco features first.
      Work is now prioritized in the Etherpad and missing things should also be added to storyboard next week.

Fenix and ETSI NFV synch

      There was also a discussion about supporting ETSI NFV defined constraints. Some instance and anti-affinity group constraints could be in Nova. Anyhow, for Fenix to be generic for any cloud, it would make sense to have more information kept within Fenix. This needs further investigation.

      Then there was a proposal of having direct subscription to Fenix from VNFM side instead of using subscription to AODH to have event alarm from Fenix notification to VNFM. One bad thing here was that VIM shouldn't have direct API call to external system. The current notification / AODH was also nice for any user to build simple manager just to receive the hint what new capability is coming to application (non-Telco) or to still have some simple solution to interact at the time of maintenance.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190505/b5ed9868/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list