[tc][all] Project deletion community goal for Train cycle
lbragstad at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 19:55:38 UTC 2019
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:17 PM Ed Leafe <ed at leafe.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:10 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard <jean-philippe at evrard.me>
> > I think it would be great to have a larger community feedback, or at
> > least a API SIG feedback, analysing this pattern.
> I would strongly prefer the approach of each service implementing an
> endpoint to be called by the Keystone when a project is deleted. Relying on
> a library that would somehow be able to understand all the parts a project
> touches within a service sounds a lot more error-prone.
Are you referring to the system scope approach detailed on line 38, here
? I might be misunderstanding something, but I didn't think keystone was
going to iterate all available services and call clean-up APIs. I think it
was just that services would be able to expose an endpoint that cleans up
resources without a project scoped token (e.g., it would be system scoped
> -- Ed Leafe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss