[dev][tc][ptl] Evaluating projects in relation to OpenStack cloud vision
zbitter at redhat.com
Thu Jan 17 01:40:13 UTC 2019
On 8/01/19 10:43 AM, Jay Bryant wrote:
> Julia and Chris,
> Thanks for putting this together. Wanted to share some thoughts in-line
> On 1/4/2019 9:53 AM, Julia Kreger wrote:
>> As some of you may or may not have heard, recently the Technical
>> Committee approved a technical vision document .
>> The goal of the technical vision document is to try to provide a
>> reference point for cloud infrastructure software in an ideal
>> universe. It is naturally recognized that not all items will apply to
>> all projects.
> The document is a really good high level view of what each OpenStack
> project should hopefully conform to. I think it would be good to get
> this into the Upstream Institute education in some way as I think it is
> something that new contributors should understand and keep in mind. It
> certainly would have helped me as a newbie to think about this.
I love this idea.
Looking at https://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/ it seems that
the syllabus for Upstream Institute is (or will eventually be)
effectively the Contributor Guide, so a good first step would be to link
to the vision from the Contributor Guide:
Any idea what else would be involved in making this happen?
>> We envision the results of the evaluation to be added to each
>> project's primary contributor documentation tree
>> (/doc/source/contributor/vision-reflection.rst) as a list of bullet
>> points detailing areas where a project feels they need adjustment to
>> better align with the technical vision, and if the project already has
>> visibility into a path forward, that as well.
> Good idea to have teams go through this. I will work on doing the above
> for Cinder.
More information about the openstack-discuss