Review-Priority for Project Repos
sean.mcginnis at gmx.com
Thu Jan 10 19:42:28 UTC 2019
> I don't know if this was the reasoning behind Cinder's system, but I know
> some people object to procedural -2 because it's a big hammer to essentially
> say "not right now". It overloads the meaning of the vote in a potentially
> confusing way that requires explanation every time it's used. At least I
> hope procedural -2's always include a comment.
This was exactly the reasoning. -2 is overloaded, but its primary meaning
was/is "we do not want this code change". It just happens that it was also a
convenient way to say that with "right now" at the end.
The Review-Priority -1 is a clear way to say whether something is held because
it can't be merged right now due to procedural or process reasons, versus
something that we just don't want at all.
More information about the openstack-discuss