[octavia] What is our next plan about 'l3-active-active' blueprint?

Jeff Yang yjf1970231893 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 5 03:29:11 UTC 2019

Yes, I want to reboot this work recently. And, I want to replace exabgp with
os-ken, So I may need to rewrite some patches.

Michael Johnson <johnsomor at gmail.com> 于2019年1月5日周六 上午8:02写道:

> Hi Jeff,
> Unfortunately the team that was working on that code had stopped due
> to internal reasons.
> I hope to make the reference active/active blueprint a priority again
> during the Train cycle. Following that I may be able to look at the L3
> distributor option, but I cannot commit to that at this time.
> If you are interesting in picking up that work, please let me know and
> we can sync up on that status of the WIP patches, etc.
> Michael
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:19 PM Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Octavia team:
> >       The email aims to ask the development progress about
> l3-active-active blueprint. I
> > noticed that the work in this area has been stagnant for eight months.
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/l3-active-active
> >       I want to know the community's next work plan in this regard.
> > Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190105/7893de3f/attachment.html>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list