[all][tc] Formalizing cross-project pop-up teams

Lance Bragstad lbragstad at gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 17:15:56 UTC 2019



On 2/13/19 6:24 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2019. Feb 11., at 23:26, Adam Spiers <aspiers at suse.com> wrote:
>>> [snip…]
>>>
>>>> To help with all this I would start the experiment with wiki pages
>>>> and etherpads as these are all materials you can point to without
>>>> too much formality to follow so the goals, drivers, supporters and
>>>> progress are visible to everyone who’s interested and to the TC to
>>>> follow-up on.
>>>> Do we expect an approval process to help with or even drive either
>>>> of the crucial steps I listed above? 
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if it would help.  But I agree that visibility is
>>> important, and by extension also discoverability.  To that end I
>>> think it would be worth hosting a central list of popup initiatives
>>> somewhere which links to the available materials for each
>>> initiative. Maybe it doesn't matter too much whether that central
>>> list is simply a wiki page or a static web page managed by Gerrit
>>> under a governance repo or similar. 
>>
>> I would start with a wiki page as it stores history as well and it’s
>> easier to edit. Later on if we feel the need to be more formal we can
>> move to a static web page and use Gerrit. 
>
> Sounds good to me.  Do we already have some popup teams?  If so we
> could set this up straight away.

The unified limits work is certainly cross-project, but it's slowed down
recently. There were a few folks from nova, keystone, and oslo working
on various parts of it.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190213/65d90cac/attachment.sig>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list