> From: Eric Fried <openstack at fried.cc> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 7:31 AM > To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [placement][nova][ptg] Resource provider - request group > mapping > > Pinging Cyborg folks. Does Cyborg needs something similar? > > I know for sure this is a yes (somewhere around [6]?), but I won't be able to > express the details as well as Sundar. Yes, Cyborg can certainly use that. Right now, the Nova patch [6] is relying on the mapping done in [7] as part of the bandwidth provider. I saw the thread where cdent is asking if Ironic would directly invoke Placement. Just curious, are there plans for Zun to leverage Placement and resource providers for containers? I should review the spec. [6] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631244/ [7] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/objects/request_spec.py?h=refs/changes/39/616239/33#n747 Regards, Sundar