[nova] "future" specs and blueprints
kchamart at redhat.com
Tue Apr 9 13:41:37 UTC 2019
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:41:49PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2019-04-02 12:56:51 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> > So yes, having this `specs/backlog/approved` does have a benefit (even
> > if it is 'marginal') than "leaving things as unmerged in Gerrit", where
> > every spec is a bland Gerrit URL, and their HTML renderings will have
> > gotten purged.
> If the draft rendering has expired and you don't feel like
> generating one locally with tox (or even just by calling
> sphinx-build directly), you can also leave a "recheck" comment on
> the change and come back later.
Ah, thanks for the tip. I keep forgetting that. (Still, it's
inconvenient, as it breaks URLs. But it's not a show-stopper.)
More information about the openstack-discuss