[PowerVMStackers][Winstackers][uc][tc] Encourage to transform from project to SIG
thierry at openstack.org
Tue Apr 9 11:04:56 UTC 2019
Tony Breeds wrote:
> This is slightly misleading, from the conversations I was present for
> the nova core team didn't want the powervm driver merged into the nova
> repo until it was ready. At no point, that I recall, was keeping the
> nova-powervm code in it's own repo (as today) but under the governance
> of the nova PTL.
> That isn't the proposal. Migration to a SIG would basically mean:
> a. Moving PowerVMStackers from  to 
> b. PowerVMSTackers SIG chair (*cough* PTL *cough*) would have to write a
> small update for the annual report
> There are a couple of things you miss out on (by default):
> 1. (ATM) contributions to SIG repos aren't part of the electorate for TC
> This wouldn't be hard to fix, and is already being discussed.
> 2. SIGs don't by default get space at PTGs or 'project update' type
> sessions at the forum. To the best of my knowledge this hasn't been
> used to date.
Actually SIGs get proposed space at PTGs, exactly like project teams do.
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
More information about the openstack-discuss