[all] Removing privacy breaches in doc

Dmitry Tantsur dtantsur at redhat.com
Mon Apr 8 17:40:00 UTC 2019


On 4/8/19 4:07 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/8/19 11:33 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps we can find a good pattern for
>>> having a README with badge types of things that includes actual content from
>>> the docs?
>>
>> One concern to keep in mind if you start looking down this path is that most
>> projects use their README by default as their package long-description. That
>> means that when uploading a package to PyPi, it will use the content of the
>> README as the description that is shown for that package.
>>
>> The rendering on PyPi, and the validation that they do that will reject the
>> package upload if it has README syntax errors, is not aware of any Sphinx
>> extensions we use in our normal docs, so pulling in other documentation into
>> the README could potentially cause release issues.
> 
> Good point. Maybe we should just stop including README content in sphinx docs, 
> and not do anything additional that's more complex?
> 

Honestly, this means copy-paste and that one of the copies will probably get 
outdated.



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list