Open Stack

Hi everyone,

I would hate for this fade away as I think we have support to keep this
moving forward even if it is very slowly. What should be the next step?
OpenLab can provide the infrastructure needed to run pretty much anything
as folks need without disturbing any existing production environments.
Honestly if folks interested in seeing this happen can help draft the scope
of work and a roadmap to get it done that would be great. I personally do
not want to be the primary person to handle this as it is not my strength
but I can help make sure the environment(s) needed are available, work on
recruiting help once we have some things outlined, keep communication
available, facilitate meetings (even in different time zones), etc.
Thoughts?

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 1:13 PM Michael McCune <msm at redhat.com> wrote:

> hey folks,
>
> i realized after some discussion with the other API SIG cores that i
> might not have been clear enough in my responses.
>
> for the record, i _do not_ have an objection to bringing the SDK work
> into the mission of the API SIG. further, i think it does make good
> sense to rally all these concerns in one place and will reduce the
> confusion that coalesces around new SIG formations. i do maintain that
> we will need to do some work and bring on fresh bodies into the SIG to
> ensure the best outcomes.
>
> for transparency sake, here is a link[0] to the chat we had in
> #openstack-sdk among the API SIG cores.
>
> peace o/
>
> [0]:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-sdks/%23openstack-sdks.2018-12-07.log.html#t2018-12-07T16:06:43
>
>

-- 
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20181216/d7749d30/attachment.html>