Meaning of role name: auditor versus reader

Adam Young ayoung at redhat.com
Thu Dec 13 01:09:17 UTC 2018


We've recently come to accept reader as one of the default roles.  However,
one thing that is not clear to me is the intention:  is this designed to be
the readonly set of operations that an admin can do, or the read only set
of operations that a member can do?

Should we really have two read-only roles, one for each case?  Perhaps the
admin-read-only should be called auditor, and then reader is for member
only operations?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20181212/43585113/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list