Open Stack

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Michael McCune <msm at redhat.com> wrote:

> thanks for bringing this up Melvin.
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:13 PM Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Essentially the proposal is to deploy OpenStack from upstream (devstack
> or other), stand up a VM within the cloud, grab all the SDKs, run
> acceptance tests, report pass/fail results, update project navigator. Of
> course there are details to be worked out and I do have a few questions
> that I hope would help get everyone interested on the same page via this
> thread.
> >
> > Does this make sense?
> >
>
> makes sense to me, and sounds like a good idea provided we have the
> people ready to maintain the testing infra and patches for this (which
> i assume we do).
>

I think we have a good base to build on, should get started, keep everyone
informed, and we can continue to work to recruit more interested folks. I
think if we work especially hard to streamline the entire process so it is
as automated as possible.


>
> > Would folks be interested in a SDK SIG or does it make more sense to
> request an item on the API SIG's agenda?
> >
>
> i don't have a strong opinion either way, but i will point out that
> the API-SIG has migrated to office hours instead of a weekly meeting.
> if you expect that the proposed SDK work will have a strong cadence
> then it might make more practical sense to create a new SIG, or really
> even a working group until the objective of the testing is reached.
>
> the only reason i bring up working groups here is that there seems
> like a clearly stated goal for the initial part of this work. namely
> creating the testing and validation infrastructure described. it might
> make sense to form a working group until the initial work is complete
> and then move continued discussion under the API-SIG for organization.
>

Working group actually makes a lot more sense, thanks for the suggestion, I
agree with you; anyone else?


>
> > Bi-weekly discussions a good cadence?
> >
>
> that sounds reasonable for a start, but i don't have a strong opinion here.
>
> > Who is interested in tackling this together?
> >
>
> if you need any help from API-SIG, please reach out. i would be
> willing to help with administrative/governance type stuff.
>

> peace o/
>


-- 
Kind regards,

Melvin Hillsman
mrhillsman at gmail.com
mobile: (832) 264-2646
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20181206/57f68d3b/attachment.html>