<html><head></head><body>Sorry about the lack of participation too.<br>
<br>
Monthly sounds good.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
JP<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On July 24, 2018 9:34:56 AM UTC, Paul Bourke <paul.bourke@oracle.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hi James,<br><br>Sorry to hear about the lack of participation. I for one am guilty of <br>not taking part, there just seems to be never enough time in the day to <br>cram in all the moving parts that a project like OpenStack requires.<br><br>That being said, this effort is definitely one of the most important to <br>the project imo, so I'm keen to step up.<br><br>Moving to a monthly meeting sounds a good idea, at least till things get <br>back on foot. Could you share what the current times / location for the <br>meeting is?<br><br>Cheers,<br>-Paul<br><br>On 23/07/18 17:01, James Page wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi All<br> <br> tl;dr we (the original founders) have not managed to invest the time to <br> get the Upgrades SIG booted - time to hit reboot or time to poweroff?<br> <br> Since Vancouver, two of the original SIG chairs have stepped down <br> leaving me in the hot seat with minimal participation from either <br> deployment projects or operators in the IRC meetings. In addition I've <br> only been able to make every 3rd IRC meeting, so they have generally not <br> being happening.<br> <br> I think the current timing is not good for a lot of folk so finding a <br> better slot is probably a must-have if the SIG is going to continue - <br> and maybe moving to a monthly or bi-weekly schedule rather than the <br> weekly slot we have now.<br> <br> In addition I need some willing folk to help with leadership in the <br> SIG. If you have an interest and would like to help please let me know!<br> <br> I'd also like to better engage with all deployment projects - upgrades <br> is something that deployment tools should be looking to encapsulate as <br> features, so it would be good to get deployment projects engaged in the <br> SIG with nominated representatives.<br> <br> Based on the attendance in upgrades sessions in Vancouver and <br> developer/operator appetite to discuss all things upgrade at said <br> sessions I'm assuming that there is still interest in having a SIG for <br> Upgrades but I may be wrong!<br> <br> Thoughts?<br> <br> James<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br><hr><br> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br> <br></blockquote><br><hr><br>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>