<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Clay Gerrard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clay.gerrard@gmail.com" target="_blank">clay.gerrard@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="gmail-">On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:prometheanfire@gentoo.org" target="_blank">prometheanfire@gentoo.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
* Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field<br></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Is the '<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not correct/sufficient?</span></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I guess we could just document that people need to use this.</div><div>  </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="gmail-"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
* Workaround would be to specify an old swiftclient to install (3.1.0, pre-ocata)<br></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Doesn't seem great if a sysadmin wants to co-install the newer swiftclient cli</div><span class="gmail-"><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
* Workaround would be to for swiftclient to be forked and 'fixed'<br>
<span class="gmail-m_-248345418493598970HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Not clear to me what the "fix" would be here - just don't do validation? I'll assume the "fork threat" here is for completeness/emphasis :D</div><div><br></div><div><div style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">Do you know if ironic works with "normal" swift tempurls or only the radosgw implementation of the swift api?</span></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It works with both, see the link from earlier in the thread: <a href="https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/214b694f05d200ac1e2ce6db631546f2831c01f7/ironic/common/glance_service/v2/image_service.py#L152-L185">https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/214b694f05d200ac1e2ce6db631546f2831c01f7/ironic/common/glance_service/v2/image_service.py#L152-L185</a></div><div><br></div><div>// jim</div></div><br></div></div>