<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Harald Jensås <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hjensas@redhat.com" target="_blank">hjensas@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-">On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 14:39 -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote:<br>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:30 PM, James Slagle <<a href="mailto:james.slagle@gmail.com">james.slagle@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> [...]<br>
><br>
> > You may want to add an item for the routed ctlplane work that<br>
> > landed<br>
> > at the end of Queens. Afaik, that will need to be supported with<br>
> > the<br>
> > containerized undercloud.<br>
><br>
> Done: <a href="https://trello.com/c/kFtIkto1/17-routed-ctlplane-networking" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://trello.com/c/<wbr>kFtIkto1/17-routed-ctlplane-<wbr>networking</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</span>Tanks Emilien,<br>
<br>
<br>
I added several work items to the Trello card, and a few patches. Still<br>
WiP.<br>
<br>
Do we have any CI that use containerized undercloud with actual Ironic<br>
deployement? Or are they all using deployed-server?<br>
<br>
E.g do we have anything actually testing this type of change?<br>
   <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543582" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#<wbr>/c/543582</a><br>
<br>
I belive that would have to be an ovb job with containerized undercloud?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm working on it since last week: <a href="https://trello.com/c/uLqbHTip/13-switch-other-jobs-to-run-a-containerized-undercloud">https://trello.com/c/uLqbHTip/13-switch-other-jobs-to-run-a-containerized-undercloud</a></div><div>But currently trying to make things stable again, we introduce regressions and this is high prio now. </div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Emilien Macchi<br></div></div>
</div></div>