<div dir="ltr">Sorry to see the Diversity channel go as we really need to get the Working Group back up and running but it never was really high volume.<div><br></div><div>Amy(spotz)</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fungi@yuggoth.org" target="_blank">fungi@yuggoth.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">For those who are unaware, Freenode doesn't allow any one user to<br>
/join more than 120 channels concurrently. This has become a<br>
challenge for some of the community's IRC bots in the past year,<br>
most recently the "openstack" meetbot (which not only handles<br>
meetings but also takes care of channel logging to<br>
<a href="http://eavesdrop.openstack.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">eavesdrop.openstack.org</a> and does the nifty bug number resolution<br>
some people seem to like).<br>
<br>
I have run some rudimentary analysis and come up with the following<br>
list of channels which have had fewer than 10 lines said by anyone<br>
besides a bot over the past three months:<br>
<br>
#craton<br>
#openstack-api<br>
#openstack-app-catalog<br>
#openstack-bareon<br>
#openstack-cloudpulse<br>
#openstack-community<br>
#openstack-cue<br>
#openstack-diversity<br>
#openstack-gluon<br>
#openstack-gslb<br>
#openstack-ko<br>
#openstack-kubernetes<br>
#openstack-networking-cisco<br>
#openstack-neutron-release<br>
#openstack-opw<br>
#openstack-pkg<br>
#openstack-product<br>
#openstack-python3<br>
#openstack-quota<br>
#openstack-rating<br>
#openstack-solar<br>
#openstack-swauth<br>
#openstack-ux<br>
#openstack-vmware-nsx<br>
#openstack-zephyr<br>
<br>
I have a feeling many of these are either no longer needed, or what<br>
little and infrequent conversation they get used for could just as<br>
easily happen in a general channel like #openstack-dev or #openstack<br>
or maybe in the more active channel of their parent team for some<br>
subteams. Who would miss these if we ceased logging/using them? Does<br>
anyone want to help by asking around to people who might not see<br>
this thread, maybe by popping into those channels and seeing if any<br>
of the sleeping denizens awaken and say they still want to keep it<br>
around?<br>
<br>
Ultimately we should improve our meetbot deployment to support<br>
sharding channels across multiple bots, but that will take some time<br>
to implement and needs volunteers willing to work on it. In the<br>
meantime we're running with the meetbot present in 120 channels and<br>
have at least one new channel that desires logging and can't get it<br>
until we whittle that number down.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Jeremy Stanley<br>
</font></span><br>______________________________<wbr>______________________________<wbr>______________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.<wbr>openstack.org?subject:<wbr>unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/<wbr>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<wbr>openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>