<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hi Eric,<br>
<br>
Here is the blueprint : <a
href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/configuration-files-validation"
moz-do-not-send="true"><br>
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/configuration-files-validation</a><br>
<br>
As Pierre Crégut presented it in his reply to Clint, the use of
Congress <br>
we suggested and config management systems complement one another.</p>
<p> Essentially, the latter reproduce delimited and <i>likely</i>
valid configurations. <br>
But there is little formal validation and you'd rely on tests as
soon as you<br>
have to make a change. Tests should be used in validation but are
not <br>
best-suited to cover many constraints.<br>
</p>
<p> By means of Congress, we could aggregate a lot of informal
requirements <br>
and rules to define what a valid state is, in a more manageable
way. <br>
We think that a declarative approach to the validation of
configuration <br>
files would be very fitting.<br>
<br>
We'd also like to discuss the prototype and how to improve its
design with the Congress team.<br>
<br>
V. Matton.</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 07/07/2017 à 01:16, Eric K a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:D584105E.6265D%25ekcs.openstack@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Valentin,
Very cool to hear about your use case and vision! It definitely sounds
like the kind of use case Congress is well-equipped to solve using a
flexible, declarative rule language.
I'd love to explore the use case further (and where it fits along side
config management systems as Clint mentioned). I'm especially curious to
learn more about the prototype and see how I can be of help from Congress
team.
I did not see the blueprint link in the original message; missed paste
perhaps?
-Eric Kao (ekcs)
On 7/4/17, 6:29 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:valentin.matton@orange.com">"valentin.matton@orange.com"</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:valentin.matton@orange.com"><valentin.matton@orange.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">We would like to use congress to check the consistency of the
configuration files used by the various Openstack services on different
nodes.
Although installers do a great job for ensuring that the initial
definition of those files are correct, it may be necessary to tweak
those files on running instances
or to use templates that are out of the bounds of the pre-configured
use-cases. Then the administrator must modify the configuration without
any safety net.
Congress is such a safety net but it ensures policies on live resources
deployed in the cloud, not on how the cloud is configured but we think
that it could be extended
to perform such verification with the adequate datasource.
So we propose a new datasource that will query each node to fetch its
configuration files as long as they follow oslo.config requirements and
structure.
As a first step we propose to use agents deployed on the different nodes
explicitly configured with the list of configuration files that push
those files to the central
congress service. Later on, oslo.config could be modified to provide a
hook used to push config files directly from running services.
The new datasource displays not only the option values, the file, host
where they are defined but also the associated metadata so that generic
rules can be defined.
It is then possible to define rules:
- that constrain the value of options between different nodes
- that constrain the values between different services or different
service plugins.
- it is even possible to use the knowledge of those configuration
options to check policies on live resources (for example when there is a
limitation or a bug in a given
driver).
We have a working prototype and the corresponding specification along
those principles that we would like to share. An initial blueprint has
been submitted here:
Please feel free to react
V. Matton
__________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-signature"><font face="TIMES"><font size="2"> <br>
<br>
</font></font></div>
<PRE>_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
</PRE></body>
</html>