<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dtantsur@redhat.com" target="_blank">dtantsur@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-">On 03/07/2017 12:32 PM, Miles Gould wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
On 06/03/17 20:46, Mario Villaplana wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
We also still have yet to decide what a suitable deprecation period is<br>
for this change, as far as I'm aware. Please respond to this email<br>
with any suggestions on the deprecation period.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
One cycle?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
I'd go with standard deprecation period of MAX(next cycle, 3 months). Pinning the version in your environment variables is quite trivial.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm also good with the standard deprecation period for this.<br><br></div><div>Reasoning about the "max" logic here made my brain hurt a bit, probably just lack of coffee. But to be clear to anyone that is unfamiliar, the deprecation period must include a cycle boundary and also span at least three months. This is described in governance docs: <a href="https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/assert_follows-standard-deprecation.html">https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/tags/assert_follows-standard-deprecation.html</a><br><br></div><div>// jim<br></div></div><br></div></div>