<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/12/16 6:19 PM, Nikhil Komawar
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:f1dd270b-8683-768a-e329-c453d1534013@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/12/16 6:04 PM, Flavio Percoco
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:20160512220408.GI32550@redhat.com"
        type="cite">On 12/05/16 17:38 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: <br>
        <blockquote type="cite">Comments, alternate proposal inline. <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          On 5/12/16 8:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: <br>
          <blockquote type="cite">On 2016-05-11 23:39:58 -0400 (-0400),
            Nikhil Komawar wrote: <br>
            <blockquote type="cite">I would like to propose adding add
              Brian to the team. <br>
            </blockquote>
            [...] <br>
            <br>
            I'm thrilled to see Glance adding more security-minded
            reviewers for <br>
            embargoed vulnerability reports! One thing to keep in mind
            though is <br>
            that you need to keep the list of people with access to
            these <br>
            relatively small; I see <br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
              href="https://launchpad.net/%7Eglance-coresec/+members">https://launchpad.net/~glance-coresec/+members</a>
            has five members now. <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          Thanks for raising this. Yes, we are worried about it too. But
          as you <br>
          bring it up, it becomes even more important. A lot of Glancers
          time <br>
          share with other projects and lack bandwidth to contribute
          fully to this <br>
          responsibility. Currently, I do not know if anyone can be
          rotated out as <br>
          we have had pretty good input from all the folks there. <br>
          <br>
          <blockquote type="cite">While the size I picked in item #2 at
            <br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc1738"
href="https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/vulnerability_managed.html#requirements"><URL:
https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/vulnerability_managed.html#requirements
              ></a> <br>
            is not meant to be a strict limit, you may still want to
            take this <br>
            as an opportunity to rotate out some of your less-active
            reviewers <br>
            (if there are any). <br>
            <br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          Thanks for not being strict on it. <br>
          <br>
          I do however, want to make another proposal: <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Since Stuart is our VMT liaison and he's on hiatus, can we add
          Brian as <br>
          his substitute. As soon as Stuart is back and is ready to
          shoulder this <br>
          responsibility we should do the rotation. <br>
          <br>
          Please vote +1, 0, -1. <br>
          <br>
          I will consider final votes by Thur May 19 2100 UTC. <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <br>
        Can we ask Stuart if he's ok with us removing him from the
        coresec team? I think <br>
        he won't have time for it and it'd be irresponsible from us to
        send VMT bugs to <br>
        him at this point. <br>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    I just realized we both meant the same thing, my description wasn't
    too clear though on what I meant as rotation.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:f1dd270b-8683-768a-e329-c453d1534013@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <blockquote cite="mid:20160512220408.GI32550@redhat.com"
        type="cite"> </blockquote>
      <br>
      Confirmation enqueue. <br>
      <br>
      <blockquote cite="mid:20160512220408.GI32550@redhat.com"
        type="cite">Cheers, <br>
        Flavio <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <br>
        <pre wrap="">__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil</pre>
  </body>
</html>