<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
Based on the comments to the RBD encryption change [1], it looks like there will be a new direction for ephemeral disk encryption (embedding it in QEMU directly). I assume LVM will work the same way when the time comes. Will there be a migration path for the
existing ephemeral disk encryption support for LVM to the new model?</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<font face="Calibri,sans-serif">[1] </font><a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239798/" style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239798/</a></div>
</span>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
</div>
<div><font face="Courier"><span style="font-size: 12px;">Yes, as I understand it, the long-term goal is to provide encryption support directly in QEMU and have a unified interface for LVM, RBD, and file-based backends. I do not yet know what the potential migration
path will look like.</span></font></div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>