<html><body><p>Hi Duan Li,<br><br>Not sure if I get your point very clearly.<br><br>1> Magnum did support :<br><a href="https://github.com/openstack/magnum/blob/master/magnum/api/controllers/v1/baymodel.py#L65">https://github.com/openstack/magnum/blob/master/magnum/api/controllers/v1/baymodel.py#L65</a><br><br>flavor-id for minion node<br>master-flavor-id for master node<br><br>So your K8s cluster could have such two kinds of flavors.<br><br><br>2> For one question about ironic case (I found you deploy on ironic), I did not think Magnum templates now support ironic case now.<br>As ironic VLAN related feature are still developing, and not merged(many patches are under review, pick one for example <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277853">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277853</a>)<br><br><br>I am not sure how would you use ironic for k8s cluster ? <br><br>Also in this summit <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/magnum-newton-design-summit-topics">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/magnum-newton-design-summit-topics</a>, we will have session about ironic cases:<br>here it is : <b><font size="4">Ironic Integration: Add support for Ironic virt-driver</font></b><br><br>If you had ways to make ironic work with Magnum, we welcome your contribution for that topic. <br><br><br>Thanks<br><br>Best Wishes,<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Kai Qiang Wu (Î⿪ǿ Kennan£©<br>IBM China System and Technology Lab, Beijing<br><br>E-mail: wkqwu@cn.ibm.com<br>Tel: 86-10-82451647<br>Address: Building 28(Ring Building), ZhongGuanCun Software Park, <br> No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing P.R.China 100193<br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Follow your heart. You are miracle! <br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=8FBBF508DFBDFC318f9e8a93df938690918c8FB@" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for "Duan, Li-Gong (Gary, HPServers-Core-OE-PSC)" ---20/04/2016 03:46:18 pm---Hi Folks, We are considerin"><font color="#424282">"Duan, Li-Gong (Gary, HPServers-Core-OE-PSC)" ---20/04/2016 03:46:18 pm---Hi Folks, We are considering whether Magnum can supports 2 Nova flavors to provision Kubernetes and</font><br><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">"Duan, Li-Gong (Gary, HPServers-Core-OE-PSC)" <li-gong.duan@hpe.com></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">20/04/2016 03:46 pm</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to provision minion nodes</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><font face="Calibri">Hi Folks,</font><br><font face="Calibri"> </font><br><font face="Calibri">We are considering whether Magnum can supports 2 Nova flavors to provision Kubernetes and other COE minion nodes.</font><br><font face="Calibri">This requirement comes from the below use cases:</font><ul><ul><font face="Calibri">- There are 2 kind of baremetal machines in customer site: one is legacy machines which doesn¡¯t support UEFI secure boot and others are new machines which support UEFI secure boot. User want to use Magnum to provisions a Magnum bay of Kubernetes from these 2 kind of baremetal machines and for the machines supporting secure boot, user wants to use UEFI secure boot to boot them up. And 2 Kubernetes label(secure-booted and non-secure-booted) are created and User can deploy their data-senstive/cirtical workload/containers/pods on the baremetal machines which are secure-booted.</font></ul></ul><font face="Calibri"> </font><br><font face="Calibri">This requirement requires Magnum to supports 2 Nova flavors(one is ¡°extra_spec: secure_boot=True¡± and the other doesn¡¯t specify it) based on the Ironic feature(</font><a href="https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/kilo-implemented/uefi-secure-boot.html"><u><font color="#0563C1" face="Calibri">https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/kilo-implemented/uefi-secure-boot.html</font></u></a><font face="Calibri"> ).</font><br><font face="Calibri"> </font><br><font face="Calibri">Could you kindly give me some comments on these requirement or whether it is reasonable from your point? If you agree, we can write design spec and implement this feature?</font><br><font face="Calibri"> </font><br><font face="Calibri">Regards,</font><br><font face="Calibri">Gary</font><tt>__________________________________________________________________________<br>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br></tt><tt><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></tt><tt><br></tt><br><br><BR>
</body></html>