<html><body><p>Hi Egor,<br> Do we need to add a cinder volume to the master nodes for Kubernetes as well? We did not run Docker on the master node before so the volume was not needed.<br>Ton Ngo,<br><br><br><img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=07BBF5ACDFB0C1D58f9e8a93df938690918c07B@" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Hongbin Lu ---01/18/2016 12:29:09 PM---Hi Egor, Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review "><font color="#424282">Hongbin Lu ---01/18/2016 12:29:09 PM---Hi Egor, Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review the patch. Agreed. We can definitely e</font><br><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu@huawei.com></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">Egor Guz <EGuz@walmartlabs.com>, OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org></font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">01/18/2016 12:29 PM</font><br><font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate</font><br><hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br><br><br><tt>Hi Egor,<br><br>Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review the patch. Agreed. We can definitely enable the swarm tests if everything works fine.<br><br>Best regards,<br>Hongbin<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Egor Guz [</tt><tt><a href="mailto:EGuz@walmartlabs.com">mailto:EGuz@walmartlabs.com</a></tt><tt>] <br>Sent: January-18-16 2:42 PM<br>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List<br>Cc: Hongbin Lu<br>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate<br><br>Hongbin,<br><br>I did some digging and found that docker storage driver wasn’t configured correctly at agent nodes.<br>Also it looks like Atomic folks recommend use deicated volumes for DeviceMapper (</tt><tt><a href="http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/">http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/</a></tt><tt>).<br>So added Cinder volume for the master as well (I tried create volumes at local storage, but it’s not even enough space for 1G volume).<br><br>Please take a look at </tt><tt><a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267996">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267996</a></tt><tt>, did around ~12 gates run and got only 2 failures (tests cannot connect to master, but all containers logs looks alrignt. e.g. </tt><tt><a href="http://logs.openstack.org/96/267996/3/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-swarm/d8d855b/console.html#_2016-01-18_04_31_17_312">http://logs.openstack.org/96/267996/3/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-swarm/d8d855b/console.html#_2016-01-18_04_31_17_312</a></tt><tt>), we have similar error rates with Kub. So after merging this code we can try to enable voting for Swarm tests, thoughts?<br><br>—<br>Egor<br><br>On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:01, Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu@huawei.com<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com">mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com</a></tt><tt>>> wrote:<br><br>There are other symptoms as well, which I have no idea without a deep dip.<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Egor Guz [</tt><tt><a href="mailto:EGuz@walmartlabs.com">mailto:EGuz@walmartlabs.com</a></tt><tt>]<br>Sent: January-08-16 2:14 PM<br>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><tt>><br>Cc: Hongbin Lu<br>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate<br><br>Hongbin,<br><br>I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning.<br>Thoughts?<br><br>—<br>Egor<br><br>On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu@huawei.com<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com">mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com</a></tt><tt>><</tt><tt><a href="mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com">mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com</a></tt><tt>>> wrote:<br><br>Done: </tt><tt><a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/</a></tt><tt><br><br>Best regards,<br>Hongbin<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Adrian Otto [</tt><tt><a href="mailto:adrian.otto@rackspace.com">mailto:adrian.otto@rackspace.com</a></tt><tt>]<br>Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM<br>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate<br><br>Hongbin,<br><br>I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach.<br><br>Adrian<br><br>On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu@huawei.com<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com">mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com</a></tt><tt>><</tt><tt><a href="mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com">mailto:hongbin.lu@huawei.com</a></tt><tt>>> wrote:<br><br>Clark,<br><br>That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the patches that already passed the check.<br><br>An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust the review accordingly.<br><br>Best regards,<br>Honbgin<br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: Clark Boylan [</tt><tt><a href="mailto:cboylan@sapwetik.org">mailto:cboylan@sapwetik.org</a></tt><tt>]<br>Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM<br>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><tt>><</tt><tt><a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><tt>><br>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate<br><br>On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote:<br>Hi folks,<br><br>It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable.<br>Please find the details in the review<br>(</tt><tt><a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/</a></tt><tt>) and let me know if you have any concern.<br><br>Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass.<br><br>Clark<br><br>______________________________________________________________________<br>____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe:<br>OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org">mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><tt>><</tt><tt><a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org">mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><tt>>?subject:unsubscribe<br></tt><tt><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></tt><tt><br><br>______________________________________________________________________<br>____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe:<br>OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br></tt><tt><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></tt><tt><br><br>__________________________________________________________________________<br>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org<</tt><tt><a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org">mailto:OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org</a></tt><tt>>?subject:unsubscribe<br></tt><tt><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></tt><tt><br>__________________________________________________________________________<br>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br></tt><tt><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></tt><tt><br><br><br>__________________________________________________________________________<br>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<br></tt><tt><a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></tt><tt><br></tt><br><BR>
</body></html>