<div dir="ltr">><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">We could just state we wont block any activity on the Debian binary release (this includes tagging, releasing, etc)</span><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br></span></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14px">I think thats key. If cloud-archive is available before we tag then fantastic, but I don't want to hold it up because of this. Additionally, we could do experimental gates for this and potentially a non-voting binary build gate. I doubt we could do a deploy gate because it will always fail. You can't run Liberty with our Mitaka code and because of that the gate would be broken almost immediately after a release.</span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14px"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#000000" face="Calibri, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:14px">Artur's patch is being broken up into several patches right now. With the pace he is going the code should be mergable before the end of the week.</span></font></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Sam Yaple</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Michał Jastrzębski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:inc007@gmail.com" target="_blank">inc007@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey,<br>
<br>
So one thing we need to consider there is that currently 3 options we<br>
support (binary+souce centos and source ubuntu) basically behaves the<br>
same way - it install current master (or last nights master, which is<br>
close enough). This one will have fundamentally different behavior,<br>
and we need to make that clear. This might be documentation issue, but<br>
I feel we need to make sure that it's there.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
inc0<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On 28 December 2015 at 10:16, Steven Dake (stdake) <<a href="mailto:stdake@cisco.com">stdake@cisco.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hey folks,<br>
><br>
> I have received significant feedback that the lack of Ubuntu binary support<br>
> is a problem for Kolla adoption. Still, we had nobody to do the work, so we<br>
> held off approving the blueprint. There were other reasons such as:<br>
><br>
> There is no delorean style repository for debian meaning we would always be<br>
> installing Liberty with our Mitaka tree<br>
> Given the first problem, a gate may not be feasible – a voting gate would<br>
> never be feasible<br>
><br>
><br>
> Still, I think on balance, the pain here is worth the gain. We could just<br>
> state we wont block any activity on the Debian binary release (this includes<br>
> tagging, releasing, etc) and mark it as "technical preview" until we sort<br>
> out the Liberty->Mitaka port in the stable branch. I'd like other core<br>
> reviewers thoughts? I really really want this feature, even if tis tech<br>
> preview and marked with all kinds of warnings. Without it Kolla is<br>
> incomplete.<br>
><br>
> This review is terrible (it needs to be broken up into separate patches) but<br>
> its a huge step in the right direction IMO :)<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260069/2" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260069/2</a><br>
><br>
> Comments and thoughts welcome.<br>
><br>
> Regards<br>
> -stevve<br>
><br>
</div></div>> __________________________________________________________________________<br>
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
> Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
><br>
<br>
__________________________________________________________________________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>