<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ivan@midokura.com" target="_blank">ivan@midokura.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">+1 for #2<br></blockquote><div><br>PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys <<a href="mailto:sandro@midokura.com">sandro@midokura.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Our IRC channels have been neglected for a long time, and as a result<br>
> we lost ownership of #midonet-dev, which is now owner by<br>
> freenode-staff. In theory, it should be very easy to get ownership<br>
> back, particularly since we still own #midonet. But in reality, it<br>
> seems like none of the freenode staff feel responsible for these<br>
> requests, so we still aren't owners after requesting it for 3 weeks<br>
> already.<br>
><br>
> Therefore, Toni Segura suggested we just ditch it and move to<br>
> #openstack-midonet instead.<br>
><br>
> However, several people have also said we don't need two channels,<br>
> i.e. we should merge #midonet and #midonet-dev.<br>
><br>
> So, here's three proposals:<br>
><br>
> Proposal #1:<br>
> * keep #midonet<br>
> * replace #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet<br>
><br>
> Proposal #2:<br>
> * keep #midonet<br>
> * merge #midonet-dev into #midonet<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>+1 <br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5">
><br>
> Proposal #3:<br>
> * replace both #midonet and #midonet-dev with #openstack-midonet<br>
><br>
> I don't have any strong feelings for any of the proposals, but suggest<br>
> we go with proposal #2. Traffic in both #midonet and #midonet-dev is<br>
> rather low, so one channel should do - there's way busier OpenStack<br>
> channels out there. Furthermore, #midonet is shorter than<br>
> #openstack-midonet and already established. I also think people will<br>
> rather look in #midonet than #openstack-midonet if they're looking for<br>
> us.<br>
><br>
> Thoughts?<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Sandro<br>
><br>
> __________________________________________________________________________<br>
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
> Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br>
__________________________________________________________________________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>