<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>I think that before this can be applied to SG rules which are on the VM ports,<br></div>there needs to be another spec in FWaaS which enable defining rules on VM ports, i am not<br></div>sure something like that currently exists. (event that there are many use cases for such ability)<br><br></div>Gal.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:55 PM, <a href="mailto:HoangCX@vn.fujitsu.com">HoangCX@vn.fujitsu.com</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:HoangCX@vn.fujitsu.com" target="_blank">HoangCX@vn.fujitsu.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Kye Mestery [PTL],<br>
CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair],<br>
CC: All,<br>
<br>
According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the "Logging API for SG and FW rules" feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team.<br>
#link <a href="http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-12-18.30.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-12-18.30.html</a><br>
<br>
The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in next week.<br>
#link <a href="http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html</a><br>
<br>
a. RFE #link <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/</a><br>
<br>
b. Specification: #link <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/</a><br>
<br>
c. Source codes: #link <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204481/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204481/</a><br>
#link <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204484/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204484/</a><br>
<br>
So could you please consider the spec for L-3 approval possibility?<br>
Currently, The RFE bug is still "Confirmed" status and would love to moving on :)<br>
<br>
P/s: I have tried to ping you in #openstack-neutron channel but you seem so busy to be on it.<br>
So I decided to send email through ML.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Best regards,<br>
Cao Xuan Hoang<br>
<br>
__________________________________________________________________________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Best Regards ,<br><br>The G. </div>
</div>