<div dir="ltr">I do agree with Jeremy. We are being away from the original topic of this thread. I suggest we initiate a separate thread on single mailing list regarding release naming policy. <div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Jaesuk Ahn <br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:38 PM Jeremy Stanley <<a href="mailto:fungi@yuggoth.org">fungi@yuggoth.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 2015-07-08 10:08:07 -0400 (-0400), Monty Taylor wrote:<br>
> On 07/08/2015 01:51 AM, Tristan Goode wrote:<br>
[...]<br>
> > So let's give up naming things like toys in our play crib, start acting<br>
> > like grown ups and using semver or plain old integers. At worst, we might<br>
> > have some people see bugs in version 13.<br>
><br>
> We already use semver. This is not a realistic solution to anything.<br>
<br>
To be slightly more specific...<br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/cinder/tag/?id=7.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/cinder/tag/?id=7.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/tag/?id=11.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/glance/tag/?id=11.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/tag/?id=7.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron/tag/?id=7.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ceilometer/tag/?id=5.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ceilometer/tag/?id=5.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/heat/tag/?id=5.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/heat/tag/?id=5.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tag/?id=12.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tag/?id=12.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/trove/tag/?id=4.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/trove/tag/?id=4.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/tag/?id=8.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/horizon/tag/?id=8.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/sahara/tag/?id=3.0.0.0b1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/sahara/tag/?id=3.0.0.0b1</a><br>
<br>
...et cetera. Is the suggestion to take the mean of those release<br>
numbers to determine an "OpenStack" release identifier, or maybe a<br>
sum total? (This is of course a rhetorical question.) We're naming a<br>
release cycle which tracks the development process of a bunch of<br>
different releases of discrete components each with their own<br>
version numbers.<br>
<br>
Also, lets stop insulting people on public mailing lists by implying<br>
that they or their processes and customs are infantile. It's not<br>
constructive at all. Further, we should pick one mailing list on<br>
which to have this discussion rather than cross-posting to four.<br>
--<br>
Jeremy Stanley<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Community@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">Community@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>